The Golden Rule's Social Justification

The Golden Scales Of Justice

Hypothesis:

Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you.
Or....

Or, what?

Or, else what will happen?

A: Or, else elimination of all players is a possibility.

PROOF

Introduction

The good news: this is a proof of The Golden Rule.

Can The Golden Rule be applied to economics in the same way as John Nash, Jr.'s, "Nash's Equilibrium?" (or, the law of chemical equilibrium -- Le Chatelier's Principle)

"the best responses of all players are in accordance with each other."
-- Nash

That's is to say;

A Nash Equilibrium = responses of all players are in accordance with each other

Q: What happens when responses of all players are not in accordance with each other?
A: Justification

If there is a pattern of:

"Not doing unto others, as you would have them do unto you."

then, you can forecast possible outcomes on Earth -- SOCIAL JUSTIFICATION

notes:

I. Geopolitical / Economic Proofs

The theory has already forecasted the stock market decline of 2000, the latest economic downturn, the war against terrorism, the Homeland Security Dept., and other evidence that Nash's Equilibrium has been violated.

II. Other On-going Experiments

The bad news:

The current analysis of patterns involving:

"Not doing unto others, as you would have them do unto you."
(most notably the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq)

forecasts the elimination of the United States' advantage in "standard of living."

[such as, US --> 2nd World Status <-- 3rd World Countries]

The worst news:
The current analysis also appears to show... that the elimination of all players is probable.



Exhibit A: The Y2K Proof

Click here for a more complete version of the Y2K Proof

Golden Rule's Social Justification forecasts that:

the billions of dollars wasted on human rights (privacy/security) violating automation, programs and systems will result in "terror" and the U.S. becoming a police state. The retrocasting of traditional businesses and government organizations is now beginning to catch-up with these issues.

Exhibit B: Stock Market Proof

Click here for the 1998 origins of this experiment. The text explains the change in our asset allocation strategy based on forecasts using The Golden Rule's Social Justification. The strategy is called Hedged Contrarian (meaning to ensure against the risk of others' wrong moves.)

Advice through Nov. 1999
Click here for examples of the investment strategy through the end of 1999. The previous forecasts had proven accurate. The model had predicted that:

the greed and ignorance of the internet and Y2K "feeding frenzy" would initially result in unjustifiably high market capitalization.
Advice after Feb. 2000
Click here for examples of the liquidation of virtually all stock positions. The model had predicted that by the Spring of 2000 the stock market would begin to pay the price for greed and ignorance. The retrocasting of traditional businesses and government organizations is now beginning to catch-up with these issues.

Exhibit Last: The Global Warming Example

Billions of dollars wasted on human rights violating pollution machines... resulting in the eradication of the species.

The Social Justification model suggests that the players have created the conditions in the "theater of operations" that will lead to an uninhabitable environment. At the current time, there is no known way for the players to stop or reverse the game clock.

For more information, see The Tunnel Under Forecasting Thesis.

Conclusion:

If WE do not

"do unto others, as WE would have them do unto us..."

then, all players will be eliminated.

a.k.a. The Golden Rule's Social Justification

Crisis Management


An Alternative "Generation Y" Translation

2003; First Publication April 1, 2003 The Philadelphia Spirit Experiment Publishing Company & KingArthur.com
These graphics, images, text copy, sights or sounds may not be used without our expressed written consent.